| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kahega Amielden Someone-anyone-name one thing that a 150km+ cruise SB could do in a gatecamp that a cruise Raven couldn't do better? i can i can!!! the raven cant make your enemie laugh to death when he sees a missile t...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.06.04 00:48:00
|
2. Make empire more expensive - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Charlie chop on 24/05/2009 00:34:46 Originally by: Sep'Shoni Do you realize that if you increase my build costs x10 I'm going to do the same thing to the cost of your ammo, modules, and ships to cover the expense? Is dramati...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.24 00:33:00
|
3. Macroing at its finest - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Killnekov Edited by: Killnekov on 20/05/2009 01:51:00 This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen, and believe me I've never seen it this bad before. If you would all draw your attention to this image: http://img1...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.20 02:13:00
|
4. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Bronson Hughes I find this thread entertaining: 1. No , you cannot insta-pop a frig anymore. So what? Unless the frig was tackled or asleep, it would have simply warped off. 2. No , you cannot do full damage to any sized...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.14 19:57:00
|
5. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murashu With cruise missiles you could easily fight frigs/ceptors 1vs1 or duo cruisers but now if I see a SB on scan I go out of my way to find them for the easy killmail. if this happens he deserves to die, now even...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.14 00:48:00
|
6. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Reisenkaze Originally by: Ranger 1 Heya Charlie. I can't speak for Reisenkaze, but he seems to be somewhat in favor of the changes but feel that the ship is too limited in scope and abilities to preform well for mos...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.13 02:25:00
|
7. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goberth Ludwig Originally by: RongYi Ok, Mr Troll, I'll bite. Please provide your statistics and KMs here. Also, let's provide me with some of your "great" FCs with excellent KMs on SB ops. Put up or shutup! htt...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.13 00:16:00
|
8. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
is it safe to say that this thread is no longer up to date with the REAL succes of the SB? i mean, all i see is people whining without showing any real data or in some really poor and useless scenarios (1v1 or pure sb fleets.) also: got any usefu...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.11 06:20:00
|
9. Questions about SB's - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Danaka In part I agree w/you and I do see your point. However it's either gonna be stealth or not. Let's suppose that you're gonna use several of them to break up a gate camp. There are bound to be opposition frigs someplace...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.11 04:32:00
|
10. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
lol ive been reading this thread since day one, and i just noticed that people say "when a ship requires other ships to perform its funcion, its fail. but is the role you think the REAL one? imo this ship's function not really well understood. he...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.11 03:45:00
|
11. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Reisenkaze and ranger 1 hey im quite lost guys, are you both vs or against the changes? its a serius question. no troll, whine agrro meant. id honestly want to know :D id just like to know your opinion :D
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.11 02:14:00
|
12. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
this is a post of sumone that showed us that tp are a must to attain FULL damage and deliver it effectivelly. plain and simple. Originally by: place1 EDIT. Maelstrom Signature Radius 460m One T2 TP adds 30% sig to give 598m Tempest Sig...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.09 03:49:00
|
13. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Reisenkaze This is where I have to draw the line; I am not just talking out my end. The members of my corp and I have dueled against each other with SB's vs BS's and couldn't pull it off. Each pilot flying between a year an...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.09 03:44:00
|
14. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: place1 Personally I think it would be nice if all the people complaining that the new bomber sucks would give some insight on just what sucks and how would your fix it. Stop complaining that its not what the old bomber was a...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.09 03:41:00
|
15. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Onizuka GTO Originally by: Charlie chop Let me put it this way, if you find yourself in a situation where you have to fight a skilled group of SB and its support, you really got the odds against you. Even in your ab...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.08 01:23:00
|
16. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
God where do I start? O yes!!.... Have you ever used one? If yes then WTF is wrong with you? 1.- Originally by: DeadlyBob that is 500 dps, before resistances, speed, and signature radius. which when factored in reduce your damage to what?...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.05.07 22:46:00
|
17. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ranger 1 Okay, just taking a spare moment here to catch up... and wow. I had to sit here for a couple of minutes to regain a bit of composure after reading the last few posts. Don't take this the wrong way gentlemen, I hav...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.04.29 04:40:00
|
18. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Charlie chop on 29/04/2009 01:05:15 Originally by: Onizuka GTO Originally by: Charlie chop just one thing, i think that giving the stealth bomber that extra 10% explotion velocity will greatly improve its fighting ...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.04.29 00:58:00
|
19. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Charlie chop on 28/04/2009 23:49:25 Originally by: Onizuka GTO Originally by: Arele Loving the bomber changes, actually makes them worth using now. People whining have no idea how to use these ships, they are a gang ...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.04.28 23:45:00
|
20. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
getting back on topic. IMHO, seriusly, all the SB needs is a bonus to the explosion velocity, at least enough to reach the same level the cruise missiles had before this patch. my reasons: before this patch, frigates, destros and some crusiers...
- by Charlie chop - at 2009.04.28 18:03:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |